Deep Humiliation

Please Share with maximum friends to support the Initiative.

Context: Everyone has experienced the feeling of humiliation. In fact, to have a sense of self and to interact with other-selves is to be exposed to the possibility of humiliation. But certain kinds of humiliation are so grave that they have no place in a decent and civilized society. 

Mains: GS IV- Ethics and Human Interface: Essence, determinants, and consequences of Ethics in human actions; dimensions of ethics; ethics in private and public relationships. Human Values – lessons from the lives and teachings of great leaders, reformers and administrators; the role of family, society and educational institutions in inculcating values.


Humiliation vs Deep Humiliation: 

  • Occasional offense, insult or disrespect lower one’s dignity but are tolerable, indeed sometimes even productive. One’s ability to restore one’s dignity here is still intact.
  • Humiliation constitutes grave wrongdoing when one’s self-worth is irretrievably lowered. When that happens, people experience what might be called deep humiliation.
    • Here, people are viewed and begin to view themselves as if they have no subjectivity — no thoughts, no viewpoint, no emotions, no sense of self.
    • They are stripped of their humanity as if falling outside the fold of human species. Of course, the mere fact of not being treated like a human is not humiliating. 
    • Deep humiliation is experienced when one is seen not only as non-human, but lower in rank than humans when one is interiorized.
    • To deeply humiliate is to contemptuously see and treat people as sub-human.
  • This is why humiliation is a special form of maltreatment, different from a mere denial of justice, freedom or fraternity. There are forms of inequality, unfreedom and social alienation that do not involve humiliation.
    • A person may not be denied dignity even when constraints are imposed on his freedom, as for instance when prisoners are treated with dignity or workers, though formally exploited by factory-owners, are still accorded respect through, say, basic welfare rights.
    • But some instances of injustice or un-freedom are accompanied by inhuman, debasing treatment.
    • Such forms of speech, gestures or actions carry a message, express an attitude towards those unequal or unfree that they do not matter at all, that they are entirely worthless, that they fall outside the ambit of humanity.

Structural humiliation: 

  • What Dalits and African Americans as a whole group suffered in the past and what many continue to undergo even now is a systematic denial of self-respect and dignity, a continual rejection, a perverted pattern of ill-treatment.
  • They experience a particular form of deep humiliation which is not episodic but structural, a feature of the social order.
  • Here, humiliation is so normalized that neither the humiliator nor the humiliating need even feels that some grave wrongdoing is afoot. Cruelly, this is so routine, so recurrent that people do not even notice it.
  • Another instance is the belief widespread among conservative Hindus and Jews, perhaps people in other communities too, in the ‘polluting nature’ of the menstrual cycle in women.
  • Though not permanent, it occurs every month for long in their life and results in such a recurrent exclusion from the life of the community that it must count as part of the same family of maltreatment.
  • And this is what is wrong with disallowing menstruating women from entering the Sabarimala temple, regardless of whatever religion or tradition-related justification that might be offered for it.

Wilful humiliation:

  • Consider this: a person deliberately throws an object on the street and then demands that it be picked up; the father of an honest police officer is asked to publicly behave like an obedient dog. This is a willful humiliation.
  • One instance of this cane be the Jews being put to purposeless work in concentration camps, only to be subjected to the pointless whim of the subjugator.
    • This work had no tangible benefit for either the Jews or the Nazis. It performed no social function.
    • Yet, for some time, it became a severe form of punishment meted out to a person just for being born a Jew.
    • Not built into the social life of early 20th century Germany, it could not be called structural.
  • Such acts are designed solely to express the will of the perpetrator; the victim, having abjectly surrendered, has no will.
    • Who can forget the haunting footage of the helpless Tabrez Ansari being mercilessly beaten to death by a mob merely because he was Muslim?
    • Rape incidents- like in the case of Nirbhaya- many of them brutal acts of disempowerment so gratuitous, so superfluous, that they do not even serve the purpose of accomplishing the sexual act and end up humiliating not just the victim but all women.



  • Humiliation is meant not only to disempower people but to ensure that the humiliating act is stamped forever on their minds, to render the resulting debasement vivid to them with the sole purpose of satisfying the humiliator.
  • In short, the pain arising in the humiliated gives the humiliator direct and unadulterated pleasure in the suffering of others. This makes it malicious.
  • The expulsion of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley was grossly unjust. Ways must be found to bring them back to the Valley and to reconcile communities.
  • There are many groups around the world that face conjunction of structural, wilful and malicious humiliation. But can we call ourselves decent or civilized, if we allow deep humiliation in any form?

Please Share with maximum friends to support the Initiative.

Enquire now

Give us a call or fill in the form below and we will contact you. We endeavor to answer all inquiries within 24 hours on business days.