Structured negotiation as a boost for disability rights – Structured Negotiation for Disability Rights in India | 8 January 2024 | UPSC Daily Editorial Analysis

Please Share with maximum friends to support the Initiative.

What's the article about?

  • It talks about the concept of structured negotiation as an alternative to litigation, particularly in the context of disability rights cases.


  • GS2: Welfare Schemes for Vulnerable Sections of the population by the Centre and States and the Performance of these Schemes; Mechanisms, Laws, Institutions and Bodies constituted for the Protection and Betterment of these Vulnerable Sections
  • Essay


  • This article explores the potential of structured negotiation, a collaborative dispute resolution method, to address accessibility barriers in India.
  • It showcases its success in the US, particularly in disability rights cases, and analyzes its applicability within the framework of India's disability legislation.
  • While acknowledging the challenges, it emphasizes the mutual benefits for both service providers and users with disabilities, urging businesses to embrace this approach for a more inclusive marketplace.

Structured Negotiation: A Collaborative Path to Resolution

  • Structured negotiation is a collaborative and solution-oriented dispute resolution technique gaining momentum as an alternative to litigation. Unlike the adversarial nature of court proceedings, it emphasizes open communication, shared understanding, and mutually beneficial outcomes. 
  • The process is “structured” because it is comprised of building blocks that include ground rules and negotiations, ultimately resulting in a written agreement. 
  • In structured negotiation, the plaintiff agrees to permit the organization to correct violations, and the parties work together to negotiate a solution, ultimately memorialized in a written agreement. 
  • Here's how it sets itself apart from litigation:
  • Process:
    • Direct engagement: Parties directly engage with each other, fostering open communication and building trust.
    • Neutral facilitator: A neutral third party guides the process, ensuring fair play and smooth communication.
    • Focus on interests, not positions: Negotiation revolves around underlying needs and interests, not rigid positions, allowing for creative solutions.
    • Flexible structure: The process can be tailored to specific needs, with set agendas and timelines but adapting to evolving circumstances.
  • Advantages over Litigation:
    • Cost-effective: Significantly reduces legal expenses compared to lengthy court battles.
    • Time-efficient: Resolves disputes faster than the often-glacial pace of litigation.
    • Preserves relationships: Focuses on collaboration rather than confrontation, potentially maintaining or even strengthening relationships.
    • Creative solutions: Allows for exploring a wider range of options beyond the binary “win-lose” scenario of litigation.
    • Empowers parties: Gives parties direct control over the outcome, fostering self-determination and satisfaction.
  • Overall, structured negotiation offers a quicker, cheaper, and more constructive path to resolving disputes compared to traditional litigation. By prioritizing collaboration and shared interests, it paves the way for win-win solutions and lasting outcomes.


  • A Collaborative Path to Accessibility: 
    • Structured negotiation, a collaborative dispute resolution technique, is gaining momentum as an alternative to litigation for disability rights cases.
    • This approach prioritizes win-win solutions, inviting service providers to address accessibility barriers while offering complainants a direct path to inclusivity.
  • Proven Success:
    • A Track Record of Accessibility Wins: Structured negotiation boasts a successful track record in the US, with cases involving inaccessible ATMs, websites, and pedestrian signals finding resolution through this method.
    • Companies like Walmart and CVS have embraced accessibility measures, demonstrating the effectiveness of this collaborative approach.
  • Win-Win Proposition:
    • Mutual Benefits for Providers and Users: The core of this success lies in the mutual benefits structured negotiation offers. Providers avoid the costs and negativity of litigation, while users gain barrier-free access.
    • However, the success hinges on a strong legal foundation, with established precedents creating a framework for negotiation.
  • India's Challenges: A Need for Streamlined Solutions: 
    • India's civil court system, marred by delays and complexities, discourages traditional dispute resolution.
    • While the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 establishes a dedicated body (CCPD), its effectiveness in addressing accessibility issues remains unclear.
    • Some incidents (like PayTM incident) highlights the need for vigilant user involvement in ensuring accessibility solutions work in practice.
  • Structured Negotiation: A Potential Solution for India: 
    • Structured negotiation presents an opportunity to address these challenges. It can offer service providers a way to avoid reputational damage and legal hassles, while allowing users to directly engage in finding solutions.
    • However, its success depends on providers prioritizing disability inclusion.

Way Forward:

  • Structured negotiation offers a promising path for resolving disability rights issues in India. By prioritizing accessibility, businesses can benefit from positive brand image and access to a new consumer segment, while users with disabilities can enjoy equal participation in the marketplace. The time has come for India to embrace this win-win approach and build a more inclusive society.

Please Share with maximum friends to support the Initiative.

Download the Samajho App

Join 5 lakh+ students in downloading PDF Notes for 2000+ Topics relevant for UPSC Civil Services Exam. &nbsp Samajho Android App: Samajho iOS App: &nbsp Samajho IAS Youtube Channel (300K+ Subscribers):